On Thursday, October 9, Kacie and I
taught our prekindergarten science lesson at Brigham Elementary School. Our lesson
was on the sense of touch. There were 8 students in the class and we had 4
assistants (classmates). This lesson was planned using the 5E model and the
lesson lasted 30 minutes. Although our lesson was not perfect, we did have
several strengths throughout. One of those strengths is the developmentally
appropriate content that we taught and the materials that we used to teach it. This
was evidenced when the children were able to show their understanding and
participate during the entire lesson. The students’ participation throughout
was a sign that the materials were appropriate for them. A second strength of
our lesson was that it was engaging. We used a variety of objects/mediums to
present the information. We had real life objects for the students to touch
during the activities, as well as, a touching matching game. In addition to
those materials, we also used the SmartBoard. Using a variety of resources to
teach with keeps the students engaged during the lesson. The evidence that
students are engaged comes from their lack of behavior issues during the
lesson. We didn’t have any students moving around or distracting the class;
they all appeared to be looking and listening to what they should have been
looking at and listening to.
With any lesson, there are always
areas that need improvement. With this particular lesson, the sequencing and
smoothness of transitions could have improved. Because it was not our classroom
and we were only visitors, we were not able to ideally prepare all of the materials.
We were not able to have them laid out and ready to go prior to the lesson, so
we had to get them out as the lesson progressed. This sometimes caused a break
in the lesson that could have otherwise been avoided.
Like I mentioned earlier, this lesson
was engaging for the students. There were a few students who exhibited high
interest and motivation and the others seemed neutral. They participated in the
activities, but they weren’t demonstrating the eagerness that the others were.
There was one part of the lesson that peaked the interest of every student. The
texture matching game motivated the students and got them excited. Every
student was interested in the activity and eager to get their turn. Not only
were the students looking forward to their own turn, but they were supportive and
encouraging of their classmates as well.
Our lesson was fairly simple and we
were both highly knowledgeable on the content. We didn’t have any questions
from students, so the only information that we delivered was the information
that we had prepared. Our true test of knowledge would have come if the
students had questions for us. The teacher organization was functional, but not
ideal. As I mentioned earlier, we weren’t able to be as organized as we would
have liked since we weren’t able to lay out the materials ahead of time. We
also did not know the names of the students, so calling on them was not as
organized as it could have been. Knowing student names reduces confusion in the
classroom and therefore makes student answering more efficient.
Since there were only 8 students,
we were able to get a good grasp on the understanding of each student. Our
small group activity allowed each teacher to work with two students. A group of
this size (two) is ideal when trying to figure out how much students know.
Along with the small group activity, we also had the matching game which was
completed on an individual level. This activity gave us the most insight into
the students and their understanding of texture. We were able to see that most
of the students understood the concept we had taught. The SmartBoard activity
was our evaluation piece and provided us with the final check for
understanding. When planning the lesson, I did not notice that nearly all of
the activities had built in checks for understanding, but when really teaching
it, I was able to see that we could gauge where each student was. I think this
is, in part, because of the size of the class. With a class size of 8, we were
able to make observations of each student more detailed.
Overall, I was proud of our lesson
and the implementation of it all. The prekindergarten class was very receptive
of our lesson and they seemed to understand what we taught. This was the first
lesson that I have had to co-teach, so that was a new experience for me. The
uncertainty of who is going to say what is another aspect that interrupted the
flow. I think that Kacie and I did a pretty good job with this, but since it
was our first time co-teaching we still had a few awkward pauses.
On a personal level, I learned how
difficult it is to change grade levels. Preschool is my favorite age group and
it is what I would like to teach upon graduation. I am very familiar with
developmentally appropriate practices in preschool and content; however, I had
some difficulty with this during the lesson. For my PDS site, I am in a second
grade classroom, so I spend 3 days a week with 7 and 8 year olds. Going from
working with these older students down to 3 and 4 year olds is challenging. I
caught myself wanting to talk to the prekindergarten class as if they were
second graders. For the most part, this was an internal battle that I handled
well.
In terms of my goal, there were
very few, if any, English language learners in the prekindergarten classroom.
During the lesson, all of the students demonstrated an ability to speak English.
Because of this, I wasn’t able to address my goal this week. Even though I wasn’t
able to address my ELL goal this week, I was able to teach a science lesson for
the first time which I think is a huge step toward becoming a proficient
teacher.
Since I had some difficulty with the grade level transition, I decided to look up some tips from other professionals who have experienced similar things. Here are a few links that I found helpful!
http://thecornerstoneforteachers.com/free-resources/your-teaching-scenario/changing-grade-levels
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct92/vol50/num02/-Changing-Assignments%E2%80%94Pros-and-Cons.aspx
Exceeds: I included some resources that would help with grade level adjustment. For the teaching aspect, Kacie and I exceeded by providing a copy of our lesson plan to the classroom teacher.